Editing a Photograph?

November 24, 2012  •  Leave a Comment

 

Reposted from Nikhil Ramkarran's photography website. 
 
     To a photographer, editing a photograph means altering the image to either put something into it that was not there, or removing something that is in the scene, but unwanted. Even then, it is a matter of degrees. Famous portrait photographer Ann Leibovitz (pregnant Demi Moore on the cover of Vanity Fair) often produces composites. She takes the photo of the person in front of a neutral background while her assistants look for and photograph suitable backgrounds. The portrait of the person is then placed on the background. There are opinions that while the result might be art, it is not a photograph. Opinions are divided.
 
     The vast majority of my photographs are processed, but not edited. The images that are produced by my camera are in a special format called “RAW” or digital negatives. Digital negatives, like negatives from a film camera, cannot be used as is. They have to be processed, like a photographer would have to process film from a film camera.
 
     Serious photographers, in the film days, would have had their own darkrooms (and there are still a significant number of photographers who still use film and have darkrooms) and done their own processing and printing.
 
      I use software to process my digital negatives (called “Lightroom” in a brilliant bit of naming by Adobe). The process is entirely analogous to the “washing” of film to produce negatives, and subsequent printing of the negatives.
 
       A modern digital cameras, that you might carry around in your pocket is more like a Polaroid instant camera than a regular film camera. The processing of the image to produce something you can put online, on facebook or print is done within the camera. So you have a usable image milliseconds after releasing the shutter.
 
      All the things that I might do in Adobe Lightroom or a film photographer might do in his darkroom are done for you, by the camera itself.
 
     Because all the decisions as to how to process the image are done by the camera itself a lot of the flexibility is lost, but you get an image that can be used immediately. The convenience of having the usable image immediately, outweighs the processing flexibility of having the digital negative, for most people.
 
     Even professional photographers, sports photographers or photo journalists, often prefer to have the finished photo straight out of the camera as deadlines have to be met, and the subtlest nuances of a scene are not of great import. Their need is to have a usable image as quickly as possible.
 
To continue reading, see here.

Comments

No comments posted.
Loading...

Archive
January (6) February (1) March April May June July August September October (1) November December
January February (1) March April May June July August September October November December
January February March (3) April May June July August September October November December
January February March April May (3) June (1) July August September October November December
January February March April May June July August September October November December
January February March April May June July August September October November December
January February March April May June July August September October November December
January February March April May June July August September October November December (1)
January February March April (1) May June July August (2) September October November December
January February March April May June July August September October November December
January February March April May June July August September October November December